Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:40:41 -0700 | From | Sodagudi Prasad <> | Subject | Re: protected pins and debugfs |
| |
On 2018-10-07 23:04, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Sodagudi Prasad (2018-10-03 05:38:24) >> >> for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++, gpio++) { >> + label = gpiochip_is_requested(chip, i); >> + if (!label) >> + continue; >> msm_gpio_dbg_show_one(s, NULL, chip, i, gpio); >> - seq_puts(s, "\n"); >> } >> } >> > > Does something not work with the following code in > msm_gpio_dbg_show_one()? > > > if (!gpiochip_line_is_valid(chip, offset)) > return;
Hi Stephen, I didnt realize that these changes are merged on tip. I was testing on 4.14 kernel.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/878107/ https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/878106/ https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/878109/
I will add "gpio-reserved-ranges" to internal platforms and this issue should not be observed.
-thanks, Prasad
-- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |