lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ext4: avoid unused variable warning
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The two new variables are only used in an #ifdef, so they cause a
> warning without CONFIG_QUOTA:
>
> fs/ext4/super.c: In function 'parse_options':
> fs/ext4/super.c:1977:26: error: unused variable 'grp_qf_name' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> char *p, *usr_qf_name, *grp_qf_name;
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/ext4/super.c:1977:12: error: unused variable 'usr_qf_name' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> char *p, *usr_qf_name, *grp_qf_name;
>
> Fixes: 20cefcdc2040 ("ext4: fix use-after-free race in ext4_remount()'s error path")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Hmm, I wonder if we should do something like:

#define EXT4_UNUSED_VAR __attribute__ ((unused))

and then we could do:

char *p, *usr_qf_name EXT4_UNUSED_VAR, *grp_qf_name EXT4_UNUSED_VAR;

More generally, I wonder if this is something we should have defined
for the whole kernel, as opposed to a one-off hack that ACPI and ext4
subsystems use. It's a little ugly, but I think it's much nicer than
having extra #ifdefs such as:

char *p;
#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
char *usr_qf_name, *grp_qf_name;
#endif

After all, the compiler is perfectly capable of ignoring variables
which are unused. And if it's only because of an #ifdef later in the
function, it would be nice to not have an extra #ifdef in the variable
declarations.

- Ted

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-10 21:27    [W:0.026 / U:2.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site