Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:02:35 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.18 24/58] Input: atakbd - fix Atari CapsLock behaviour |
| |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:58:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:49:47PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:40:39AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 08:28:40PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:11:48PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > > > I think Greg's last estimate was that about 1/3 of the kernels in the >> > > > wild are custom based on a kernel.org stable kernel, which means that we >> > > > have no visibility as to what they do with the kernel. If you don't know >> > > > who your users are, how can you prioritize some subsystems over others? >> > > >> > > The numbers I had was 75% of the images a major cloud provider was using >> > > was either a kernel.org stable kernel release, or Debian. The remaining >> > > 25% was an "enterprise" kernel including CentOS. >> > > >> > > Also note that all Android devices are now required to follow the stable >> > > kernel releases as well, so add a few more million to that number :) >> > > >> > > That being said, for a well-maintained subsystem like Input, whose >> > > maintainer almost always marks patches for stable releases, having them >> > > picked up by the autobot is unusual. Dmitry, if you want your subsytem >> > > to be excluded, just let Sasha know, other subsystems have been excluded >> > > at the maintainer's request, and that's fine. >> > >> > I am hesitant to request to exclude input from autosel just yet, on an >> > account that I might miss something. But I would like autosel to acquire >> > more smarts and be less trigger happy. I think it would be for the best >> > for everyone. >> >> Keep in mind that it learns based on your choices, so maybe in a while >> it will be a perfect fit :) >> >> Maybe to make it easier, just reply with NAK on the patch(es) you don't >> want in the tree and I'll drop them. > >OK, I will be doing it then. Should it be a certain string so you can >script or a free form?
Nah, I go through any comments I receive and am not planning on changing that.
>> >> I was discussing more about the general case and stable tree policy >> rather than drivers/input and AUTOSEL, and didn't mean to try and >> dictate what we'll take or not. Sorry! > >Me too and I am not trying to be dismissive of your effort, I am just >trying to have discussion on the criteria that we should use for stable >candidates.
This is great input for me as well. Thank you!
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |