lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] asm/generic: introduce if_nospec and nospec_barrier
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Dan Williams wrote:

> Speaking from a purely Linux kernel maintenance process perspective we
> play wack-a-mole with missed endian conversions and other bugs that
> coccinelle, sparse, etc help us catch.

Fully agreed.

> So this is in that same category, but yes, it's inconvenient.

Disagreed, violently. CPU has to execute the instructions I ask it to
execute, and if it executes *anything* else that reveals any information
about the instructions that have *not* been executed, it's flawed.

> Elena has done the work of auditing static analysis reports to a dozen
> or so locations that need some 'nospec' handling.

How exactly is that related (especially in longer-term support terms) to
BPF anyway?

Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-04 03:00    [W:0.093 / U:6.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site