lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 3/6] can: m_can: Add PM Runtime
From
Date
On 01/03/2018 01:39 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 January 2018 09:37 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 12/22/2017 02:31 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>> From: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for PM Runtime which is the new way to handle managing clocks.
>>> However, to avoid breaking SoCs not using PM_RUNTIME leave the old clk
>>> management approach in place.
>>
>> There is no PM_RUNTIME anymore since 464ed18ebdb6 ("PM: Eliminate
>> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME")
>
> Ok. Will change the commit message.
>
>>
>> Have a look at the discussion: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9436507/ :
>>
>>>> Well, I admit it would be nicer if drivers didn't have to worry about
>>>> whether or not CONFIG_PM was enabled. A slightly cleaner approach
>>>> from the one outlined above would have the probe routine do this:
>>>>
>>>> my_power_up(dev);
>>>> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
>>>> pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
>>>> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>
> This discussion seems to be about cases in which CONFIG_PM is not
> enabled. CONFIG_PM is always selected in the case of omap devices.

Yes, but in the commit message you state that you need to support
systems that don't have PM_RUNTIME enabled. The only mainline SoCs I see
is "arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi" so far. Please check if they select
CONFIG_PM, then we can make the driver much simpler.

>>> PM_RUNTIME is required by OMAP based devices to handle clock management.
>>> Therefore, this allows future Texas Instruments SoCs that have the MCAN IP
>>> to work with this driver.
>>
>> Who will set the SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS in this case?
>
> It is set with a common SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS in the case of omap at
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c:632
>
> struct dev_pm_domain omap_device_pm_domain = {
> .ops = {
> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(_od_runtime_suspend, _od_runtime_resume,
> NULL)
> USE_PLATFORM_PM_SLEEP_OPS
> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(_od_suspend_noirq,
> _od_resume_noirq)
> }
> };
>
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
>>> [nsekhar@ti.com: handle pm_runtime_get_sync() failure, fix some bugs]
>>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
>>> index f72116e..53e764f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>> #include <linux/can/dev.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -625,19 +626,33 @@ static int m_can_clk_start(struct m_can_priv *priv)
>>> {
>>> int err;
>>>
>>> + err = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->device);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->device);
>>
>> Why do you call this in case of an error?
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the usage count of the device before
> any error is returned. This needs to be decremented using
> pm_runtime_put_noidle().

Oh, I'm curious how many drivers don't get this right.

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-03 15:26    [W:0.056 / U:3.012 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site