lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/6] can: dev: Add support for limiting configured bitrate
From
Date
Hi Marc,

On Tuesday 02 January 2018 06:30 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 12/22/2017 02:31 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> From: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
>>
>> Various CAN or CAN-FD IP may be able to run at a faster rate than
>> what the transceiver the CAN node is connected to. This can lead to
>> unexpected errors. However, CAN transceivers typically have fixed
>> limitations and provide no means to discover these limitations at
>> runtime. Therefore, add support for a can-transceiver node that
>> can be reused by other CAN peripheral drivers to determine for both
>> CAN and CAN-FD what the max bitrate that can be used. If the user
>> tries to configure CAN to pass these maximum bitrates it will throw
>> an error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
>> [nsekhar@ti.com: fix build error with !CONFIG_OF]
>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v6 changes:
>> fix build error with !CONFIG_OF
>>
>> drivers/net/can/dev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/can/dev.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev.c b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
>> index 365a8cc..007cfc0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>> #include <linux/can/skb.h>
>> #include <linux/can/netlink.h>
>> #include <linux/can/led.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <net/rtnetlink.h>
>>
>> #define MOD_DESC "CAN device driver interface"
>> @@ -814,6 +815,30 @@ int open_candev(struct net_device *dev)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(open_candev);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +/*
>> + * Common function that can be used to understand the limitation of
>> + * a transceiver when it provides no means to determine these limitations
>> + * at runtime.
>> + */
>> +void of_can_transceiver(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *dn;
>> + struct can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->dev.parent->of_node;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + dn = of_get_child_by_name(np, "can-transceiver");
>> + if (!dn)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dn, "max-bitrate", &priv->max_bitrate);
>> + if ((ret && ret != -EINVAL) || (!ret && !priv->max_bitrate))
>> + netdev_warn(dev, "Invalid value for transceiver max bitrate. Ignoring bitrate limit.\n");
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_can_transceiver);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * Common close function for cleanup before the device gets closed.
>> *
>> @@ -913,6 +938,13 @@ static int can_changelink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
>> priv->bitrate_const_cnt);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> +
>> + if (priv->max_bitrate && bt.bitrate > priv->max_bitrate) {
>> + netdev_err(dev, "arbitration bitrate surpasses transceiver capabilities of %d bps\n",
>> + priv->max_bitrate);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> What about movong this check into can_get_bittiming()? Although we loose
> the "arbitration" vs "canfd data".

I would prefer to keep the distinction.

>
>> +
>> memcpy(&priv->bittiming, &bt, sizeof(bt));
>>
>> if (priv->do_set_bittiming) {
>> @@ -997,6 +1029,13 @@ static int can_changelink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
>> priv->data_bitrate_const_cnt);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> +
>> + if (priv->max_bitrate && dbt.bitrate > priv->max_bitrate) {
>> + netdev_err(dev, "canfd data bitrate surpasses transceiver capabilities of %d bps\n",
>> + priv->max_bitrate);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> memcpy(&priv->data_bittiming, &dbt, sizeof(dbt));
>>
>> if (priv->do_set_data_bittiming) {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/can/dev.h b/include/linux/can/dev.h
>> index 61f1cf2..fbb7810 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/can/dev.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/can/dev.h
>> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct can_priv {
>> unsigned int data_bitrate_const_cnt;
>> struct can_clock clock;
>>
>> + unsigned int max_bitrate;
>
> Please make it an u32, name it "bitrate_max" and ...

Sure.

>
>>> struct can_priv {
>>> struct net_device *dev;
>>> struct can_device_stats can_stats;
>>>
>>> struct can_bittiming bittiming, data_bittiming;
>>> const struct can_bittiming_const *bittiming_const,
>>> *data_bittiming_const;
>>> const u16 *termination_const;
>>> unsigned int termination_const_cnt;
>>> u16 termination;
>>> const u32 *bitrate_const;
>>> unsigned int bitrate_const_cnt;
>>> const u32 *data_bitrate_const;
>>> unsigned int data_bitrate_const_cnt;
>
> ...move it here.

Ok.

Thanks,
Faiz


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-03 13:20    [W:0.042 / U:8.540 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site