lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Fewer CPUID invocations in init_scattered_cpuid_features()
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:53:33PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> We were doing a fresh CPUID for every single bit in every single output
> register. Do it once and then harvest *all* the bits we want.
>
> We were also doing the max_level check with a new CPUID invocation for
> every single bit. Stop that too.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> ---
> Spotted this in my travels; it offended me.

Ok, I see that it's itching so let's scratch it properly :-)

If we're going to optimize scattered.c, let's do something like this:

* do CPUID for each function once.
* for each set bit in there, set feature flag

which means we'd have to change the data structure.

struct cpuid_leaf {
u32 level;
u32 sub_leaf;
struct cpuid_bit bits[];
};

and that last thing is:

struct cpuid_bit {
u16 feature;
u8 reg;
u8 bit;
};

So that you have something like (for example with leaf 0x10):

struct cpuid_leaf leafs[] = {
...
{
.level = 0x00000010,
.sub_leaf = 0,
.bits = {
{ X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3, CPUID_EBX, 1 },
{ X86_FEATURE_CAT_L2, CPUID_EBX, 2 },
{ X86_FEATURE_MBA , CPUID_EBX, 3 },
{ 0 }
}
}
...
}

This way you get the CPUID only once and then iterate over bits[] and
you can do the cleaner max level computation

cpuid_eax(level & 0xffff0000);

without having to do the extended level checks.

Anyway, something like that.

It's probably not even worth doing anything though - I doubt the speedup
is visible at all.

But I certainly understand the intent to fix an annoying thing like that. :-))

Thx.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-23 18:33    [W:0.400 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site