lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:40:06 +0100
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:59:47 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:07:02 +0100
> > Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > To be able to switch off specific CPU alternatives with kernel parameters
> > > make a copy of the facility bit mask provided by STFLE and use the copy
> > > for the decision to apply an alternative.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/facility.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/lowcore.h | 3 ++-
> > > arch/s390/kernel/alternative.c | 3 ++-
> > > arch/s390/kernel/early.c | 3 +++
> > > arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 4 +++-
> > > arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 4 +++-
> > > 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > You have dropped various r-bs (including mine). Has this patch been
> > changed? (Doesn't look like it.)
>
> Added your and Davids r-b to patch #2, as well as your a-b to patch #4.
>

OK, thx.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-23 16:05    [W:0.048 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site