lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.4 00/53] 4.4.113-stable review
Hi Greg,

On 23 January 2018 at 12:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:19:07AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 22 January 2018 at 14:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.113 release.
>> > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 24 08:38:52 UTC 2018.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.113-rc1.gz
>> > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
>
> Thanks for letting me know how they all worked.
>
>> NOTE:
>> On arm64 Hikey620 device cpufreq test failed.
>> We are suspecting due to missing config on Hikey620
>> CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX=y
>> You may ignore this now. because it is coming from internal tree.
>> https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git
>
> Is this new? That shouldn't have been something that changed in this
> kernel release, maybe a few releases ago? There has been a push to sync
> some of the hikey patches into the stable tree to make testing like this
> easier for you to do, hopefully it isn't breaking anything...

This is a 'new' one, due to me changing over to a tree with minimal
hikey patches for stable and stable-rc testing. I missed to cherry
pick the hikey mailbox driver patch.
With that corrected, we are back to the same numbers, and the cpufreq
tests also pass.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Best,
Sumit.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-23 07:57    [W:0.047 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site