lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: add num-channels binding for remotely controlled
    On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:02:34PM +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
    > From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
    >
    > When Linux is master of BAM, it can directly read registers to know number
    > of supported channels, however when its remotely controlled reading these
    > registers would trigger a crash if the BAM is not yet intialized/powered up
    > on the remote side.
    >
    > This patch adds num-channels binding to specify number of supported
    > dma channels on remotely controlled BAM.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
    > ---
    > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom_bam_dma.txt | 2 ++
    > drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 13 +++++++++++--
    > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom_bam_dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom_bam_dma.txt
    > index 9cbf5d9df8fd..aa6822cbb230 100644
    > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom_bam_dma.txt
    > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom_bam_dma.txt
    > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ Required properties:
    > the secure world.
    > - qcom,controlled-remotely : optional, indicates that the bam is controlled by
    > remote proccessor i.e. execution environment.
    > +- num-channels : optional, indicates supported number of DMA channels in a
    > + remotely controlled bam.
    >
    > Example:
    >
    > diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
    > index 78e488e8f96d..523bd178047a 100644
    > --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
    > +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
    > @@ -1083,8 +1083,10 @@ static int bam_init(struct bam_device *bdev)
    > if (bdev->ee >= val)
    > return -EINVAL;
    >
    > - val = readl_relaxed(bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_NUM_PIPES));
    > - bdev->num_channels = val & BAM_NUM_PIPES_MASK;
    > + if (!bdev->num_channels) {
    > + val = readl_relaxed(bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_NUM_PIPES));
    > + bdev->num_channels = val & BAM_NUM_PIPES_MASK;
    > + }
    >
    > if (bdev->controlled_remotely)
    > return 0;
    > @@ -1179,6 +1181,13 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
    > bdev->controlled_remotely = of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node,
    > "qcom,controlled-remotely");
    >
    > + if (bdev->controlled_remotely) {

    hmm so if we remove the remotely controlled instanced from DT and then Linux
    won't see them and not do anything. Do we need to do configuration of these
    instances too?

    > + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "num-channels",
    > + &bdev->num_channels);
    > + if (ret)
    > + dev_err(bdev->dev, "num-channels unspecified in dt\n");
    > + }
    > +
    > bdev->bamclk = devm_clk_get(bdev->dev, "bam_clk");
    > if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk)) {
    > bdev->bamclk = NULL;
    > --
    > 2.15.1
    >

    --
    ~Vinod

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-01-19 06:51    [W:5.548 / U:0.156 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site