Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:39:44 +0000 | From | Dave Martin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 07/11] signal/arm64: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE, SIGTRAP, SIGBUS |
| |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:24:06AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
[...]
> > Should si_code simply be ignored for the SIGKILL case? > > I know what x86 does in a similar case is it uses force_sig instead of > force_sig_info. Then the generic code gets to worry about > > If the appropriate paths generic paths get to worry about what siginfo > to fill in in that case. Which for SI_KERNEL is zero for everything > except the si_code and the si_signo. > > That seems perfectly reasonable.
OK, I'll go with SI_KERNEL then.
Cheers ---Dave
| |