Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:43:35 +0000 (UTC) | From | Eric Wheeler <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drbd: fix discard_zeroes_if_aligned regression |
| |
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> NAK. Calling a discard and expecting zeroing is simply buggy.
But of course, that would be silly.
We don't expect discard to zero---but we do expect discard to discard!
> And double NAK for patches like this without a linux-block Cc.
My appologies, I thought this was internal to DRBD.
What is the general rule here?
Should linux-block always be Cc'ed with a patch?
-- Eric Wheeler
| |