Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ptr_ring: document usage around __ptr_ring_peek | From | John Fastabend <> | Date | Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:15:47 -0800 |
| |
On 01/10/2018 06:03 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This explains why is the net usage of __ptr_ring_peek > actually ok without locks. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > --- > > John - I think this is more or less what you meant. Is that right?
Yep, thanks for following up.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
| |