lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: Avoid slot reset for Cavium cn8xxx root ports
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:01:30AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:40:52 +0200
> Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:40:12AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:24:54 +0200
> > > Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Root ports of cn8xxx do not function after a slot reset when used with
> > > > some e1000e and LSI HBA devices. Add a quirk to prevent slot reset on
> > > > these root ports.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > > index 85191b8..6679971 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > > @@ -845,6 +845,22 @@ static void quirk_cavium_sriov_rnm_link(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CAVIUM, 0xa018, quirk_cavium_sriov_rnm_link);
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Root port on some Cavium CN8xxx chips do not successfully complete
> > > > + * a bus reset when used with certain types of child devices. Config
> > > > + * space access to the child may quit responding. Flag all devices under
> > > > + * the secondary bus as non-resettable.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void quirk_CN8xxx_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > > +
> > > > + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Cavium CN8xxx quirk detected; reset for devices on secondary bus disabled\n");
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(pdev, &dev->subordinate->devices, bus_list)
> > > > + pdev->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_BUS_RESET;
> > > > +}
> > > > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CAVIUM, 0xa100, quirk_CN8xxx_secondary_bus);
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Some settings of MMRBC can lead to data corruption so block changes.
> > > > * See AMD 8131 HyperTransport PCI-X Tunnel Revision Guide
> > >
> > >
> > > This doesn't seem reliable, doesn't the user just need to remove and
> > > reprobe the slot and the device would re-appear without this flag set?
> >
> > No, I tried before to disable the slot with "echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/3/power"
> > but that does not work as it is not supported.
> >
> > I'm not familiar with the quirk types, would another one be better
> > suited here (even if we don't have the problem you descibed)?
>
> The scenario I'm mentioning is to "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<some
> device under the slot>/remove", then "echo <that device address> >
> /sys/bus/pci/rescan". This would break the ordering implicit in using
> a fixup defined for the root port. It seems like it'd make a lot more
> sense to add a test on the parent bridge more similar to how the bus
> reset works. It's not the subordinate devices imposing the
> no-bus-reset flag, it's the bridge device and the objects and code
> should support and reflect that. Thanks,

Doing "echo <that device address> > /sys/bus/pci/rescan" after the
remove did not work for me, but maybe the format of the device address
needs to be different. Anyway, the sequence
echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<some device under the slot>/remove
echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
still triggers the panic as you mentioned above.

I agree that the subordinate devices are not causing the issue, still
I need to make pci_slot_resetable() return false in our case.

So what if we add an additional check like:

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index fdf65a6..389db4b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -4389,6 +4389,9 @@ static bool pci_slot_resetable(struct pci_slot *slot)
{
struct pci_dev *dev;

+ if (slot->bus->self & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_BUS_RESET)
+ return false;
+
list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
continue;
--Jan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-07 09:41    [W:0.085 / U:1.332 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site