lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mmc: cavium: Fix use-after-free in of_platform_device_destroy
From
Date
On 09/07/2017 09:58 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> wrote:
>> KASAN reported the following:
>>
>> [ 19.338655] ==================================================================
>> [ 19.345946] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in of_platform_device_destroy+0x88/0x100
>> [ 19.345966] Read of size 8 at addr fffffe01aa6f1468 by task systemd-udevd/264
>>
>> [ 19.345983] CPU: 1 PID: 264 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.13.0-jang+ #737
>> [ 19.345989] Hardware name: Cavium ThunderX CN81XX board (DT)
>> [ 19.345995] Call trace:
>> [ 19.346013] [<fffffc800808b1b0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x368
>> [ 19.346026] [<fffffc800808b6bc>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
>> [ 19.346040] [<fffffc8008cbb944>] dump_stack+0xa4/0xc8
>> [ 19.346057] [<fffffc80082c2870>] print_address_description+0x68/0x258
>> [ 19.346070] [<fffffc80082c2d70>] kasan_report+0x238/0x2f8
>> [ 19.346082] [<fffffc80082c14a8>] __asan_load8+0x88/0xb8
>> [ 19.346098] [<fffffc8008aacee0>] of_platform_device_destroy+0x88/0x100
>> [ 19.346131] [<fffffc8000e02fa4>] thunder_mmc_probe+0x314/0x550 [thunderx_mmc]
>> [ 19.346147] [<fffffc800879d560>] pci_device_probe+0x158/0x1f8
>> [ 19.346162] [<fffffc800886e53c>] driver_probe_device+0x394/0x5f8
>> [ 19.346174] [<fffffc800886e8f4>] __driver_attach+0x154/0x158
>> [ 19.346185] [<fffffc800886b12c>] bus_for_each_dev+0xdc/0x140
>> [ 19.346196] [<fffffc800886d9f8>] driver_attach+0x38/0x48
>> [ 19.346207] [<fffffc800886d148>] bus_add_driver+0x290/0x3c8
>> [ 19.346219] [<fffffc800886fc5c>] driver_register+0xbc/0x1a0
>> [ 19.346232] [<fffffc800879b78c>] __pci_register_driver+0xc4/0xd8
>> [ 19.346260] [<fffffc8000e80024>] thunder_mmc_driver_init+0x24/0x10000 [thunderx_mmc]
>> [ 19.346273] [<fffffc8008083a80>] do_one_initcall+0x98/0x1c0
>> [ 19.346289] [<fffffc8008177b54>] do_init_module+0xe0/0x2cc
>> [ 19.346303] [<fffffc8008175cf0>] load_module+0x3238/0x35c0
>> [ 19.346318] [<fffffc8008176438>] SyS_finit_module+0x190/0x1a0
>> [ 19.346329] [<fffffc80080834a0>] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4
>>
>> This is caused by:
>>
>> platform_device_register()
>> -> platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(dev))
>> freeing struct device
>> -> of_node_clear_flag(dev->of_node, ...)
>> writing to the freed device
>>
>> The issue is solved by increasing the reference count before calling
>> of_platform_device_destroy() so freeing the device is postponed after
>> the call.
>>
>> Fixes: 8fb83b142823 ("mmc: cavium: Fix probing race with regulator")
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/cavium-thunderx.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-thunderx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-thunderx.c
>> index b9cc95998799..eee08d81b242 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-thunderx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-thunderx.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> *
>> * Copyright (C) 2016 Cavium Inc.
>> */
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>> @@ -149,8 +150,11 @@ static int thunder_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> for (i = 0; i < CAVIUM_MAX_MMC; i++) {
>> if (host->slot[i])
>> cvm_mmc_of_slot_remove(host->slot[i]);
>> - if (host->slot_pdev[i])
>> + if (host->slot_pdev[i]) {
>> + get_device(&host->slot_pdev[i]->dev);
>> of_platform_device_destroy(&host->slot_pdev[i]->dev, NULL);
>> + put_device(&host->slot_pdev[i]->dev);
>
> Why do you think this is Cavium specific?
>
> From my look of it, the problem is in of_platform_device_destroy. We
> should save the node ptr before the unregister call and use that to
> clear the flags.
>

I agree, forcing all users of the core functions like
of_platform_device_destroy() to get this right every time is not likely
to work.

Modifying of_platform_device_destroy() to make it safe to call from this
context is preferable as it will lead to a more robust kernel overall.

Thanks,
David Daney


> Rob
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-07 19:15    [W:0.072 / U:2.068 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site