Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC Part2 PATCH v3 02/26] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) device support | From | Brijesh Singh <> | Date | Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:38:38 -0500 |
| |
Hi Boris,
On 09/06/2017 12:00 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...
> -------------------------- > |diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.c > |index a017233..d263ba4 100644 > |--- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.c > |+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.c > -------------------------- > > What tree is that against? In any case, it doesn't apply here. > >> This RFC is based on tip/master commit : 22db3de (Merge branch 'x86/mm'). >
This bit of my struggle -- tip/master is not in sync with cryptodev-2.6 [1]. In order to expand the CCP driver we need the following commits from the cryptodev-2.6
57de3aefb73f crypto: ccp - remove ccp_present() check from device initialize d0ebbc0c407a crypto: ccp - rename ccp driver initialize files as sp device f4d18d656f88 crypto: ccp - Abstract interrupt registeration 720419f01832 crypto: ccp - Introduce the AMD Secure Processor device 970e8303cb8d crypto: ccp - Use devres interface to allocate PCI/iomap and cleanup
I cherry-picked these patches into tip/master before starting the SEV work.
Since these patches were already reviewed and accepted hence I did not include it in my RFC series. I am not sure what is best way to handle it. Should I include these patches in the series ? or just mention them in cover letter ? I am looking for suggestions on how to best communicate it. thanks
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git/
My staging tree on github contain these precursor patches.
> $ git show 22db3de > fatal: ambiguous argument '22db3de': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > > Do you have updated version of the series which you can send out? > >> @@ -67,6 +74,10 @@ struct sp_device { >> /* DMA caching attribute support */ >> unsigned int axcache; >> >> + /* get and set master device */ >> + struct sp_device*(*get_psp_master_device)(void); >> + void(*set_psp_master_device)(struct sp_device *); > > WARNING: missing space after return type > #502: FILE: drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h:79: > + void(*set_psp_master_device)(struct sp_device *); > > Don't forget to run all patches through checkpatch. Some of the warnings > make sense. > > Thx. >
| |