lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] e1000e: changed some expensive calls of udelay to usleep_range
Hi!

> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ s32 e1000e_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)
> * reading duplicate data in the next MDIC transaction.
> */
> if (hw->mac.type == e1000_pch2lan)
> - udelay(100);
> + usleep_range(90, 100);
>
> return 0;
> }

Can you explain why shortening the delay is acceptable here?

> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ s32 e1000e_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)
> * reading duplicate data in the next MDIC transaction.
> */
> if (hw->mac.type == e1000_pch2lan)
> - udelay(100);
> + usleep_range(90, 110);
>
> return 0;
> }

And here?
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-04 18:27    [W:0.359 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site