Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:23:13 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: hotplug lockdep splat (tip) |
| |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 09:55:02AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 08:59:35AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > [ 126.626908] Unregister pv shared memory for cpu 1 > > [ 126.631041] > > [ 126.631269] ====================================================== > > [ 126.632442] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > > [ 126.633599] 4.13.0.g06260ca-tip-lockdep #2 Tainted: G E > > [ 126.634380] ------------------------------------------------------ > > [ 126.635124] stress-cpu-hotp/3156 is trying to acquire lock: > > [ 126.635804] ((complete)&st->done){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8108d19a>] takedown_cpu+0x8a/0xf0 > > [ 126.636809] > > [ 126.636809] but task is already holding lock: > > [ 126.637567] (sparse_irq_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81107ac7>] irq_lock_sparse+0x17/0x20 > > [ 126.638665] > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829193416.GC32112@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net > > I still need to write a coherent Changelog and comments for that :/
How's this?
--- Subject: smp/hotplug,lockdep: Annotate st->done
With the new lockdep cross-release feature, cpu hotplug reports the following deadlock:
takedown_cpu() irq_lock_sparse() wait_for_completion(&st->done)
cpuhp_thread_fun cpuhp_up_callback cpuhp_invoke_callback irq_affinity_online_cpu irq_local_spare() irq_unlock_sparse() complete(&st->done)
However, CPU-up and CPU-down are globally serialized, so the above scenario cannot in fact happen.
Annotate this by splitting the st->done dependency chain for up and down.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> --- kernel/cpu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index acf5308fad51..0f44ddf64f24 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -533,6 +533,28 @@ void __init cpuhp_threads_init(void) kthread_unpark(this_cpu_read(cpuhp_state.thread)); } +/* + * _cpu_down() and _cpu_up() have different lock ordering wrt st->done, but + * because these two functions are globally serialized and st->done is private + * to them, we can simply re-init st->done for each of them to separate the + * lock chains. + * + * Must be macro to ensure we have two different call sites. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +#define lockdep_reinit_st_done() \ +do { \ + int __cpu; \ + for_each_possible_cpu(__cpu) { \ + struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = \ + per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, __cpu); \ + init_completion(&st->done); \ + } \ +} while(0) +#else +#define lockdep_reinit_st_done() +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU /** * clear_tasks_mm_cpumask - Safely clear tasks' mm_cpumask for a CPU @@ -676,12 +698,6 @@ void cpuhp_report_idle_dead(void) cpuhp_complete_idle_dead, st, 0); } -#else -#define takedown_cpu NULL -#endif - -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU - /* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen, enum cpuhp_state target) @@ -697,6 +713,8 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen, cpus_write_lock(); + lockdep_reinit_st_done(); + cpuhp_tasks_frozen = tasks_frozen; prev_state = st->state; @@ -759,6 +777,9 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu) return do_cpu_down(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_down); + +#else +#define takedown_cpu NULL #endif /*CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU*/ /** @@ -806,6 +827,8 @@ static int _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen, enum cpuhp_state target) cpus_write_lock(); + lockdep_reinit_st_done(); + if (!cpu_present(cpu)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out;
| |