lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/4] sched/clock: interface to allow timestamps early in boot
From
Date
Hi, Pasha

At 09/28/2017 09:11 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>>>> It will be best if we can support TSC sync capability in x86, but seems
>>>> is not easy.
>>>
>>> Sure, your hardware achieving sync would be best, but even if it does
>>> not, we can still use TSC. Using notsc simple because you fail to sync
>>> TSCs is quite crazy.
>>>
>>> The thing is, we need to support unsync'ed TSC in any case, because
>>> older chips (pre Nehalem) didn't have synchronized TSC in any case, and
>>> it still happens on recent chips if the BIOS mucks it up, which happens
>>> surprisingly often :-(
>>>
>>> I would suggest you try your reconfigurable setup with "tsc=unstable"
>>> and see if that works for you. That marks the TSC unconditionally
>>> unstable at boot and avoids any further wobbles once the TSC watchdog
>>> notices (although that too _should_ more or less work).
>>
>> That should do the trick nicely and we might just end up converting notsc
>> to tsc=unstable silently so we can avoid the bike shed discussions about
>> removing it.
>>
>
> Ok, I will start working on converting notsc to unstable, and modify my
> patches to do what Peter suggested earlier. In the mean time, I'd like
> to hear from Dou if this setup works with dynamic reconfig.
>

OK, I will do it, But, October 1 is our national holiday, I will in
holiday, and I just returned the test machine. :-(

May reply you in middle of the October.

Thanks,

dou.

> Thank you,
> Pasha
>
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-29 17:01    [W:0.068 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site