lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] sched/idle: update poll time when wakeup from idle
From
Date


On 2017/8/29 20:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:46:41AM +0000, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> In ttwu_do_wakeup, it will update avg_idle when wakeup from idle. Here
>> we just reuse this logic to update the poll time. It may be a little
>> late to update the poll in ttwu_do_wakeup, but the test result shows no
>> obvious performance gap compare with updating poll in irq handler.
>>
>> one problem is that idle_stamp only used when using CFS scheduler. But
>> it is ok since it is the default policy for scheduler and only consider
>> it should enough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@gmail.com>
> Same broken SoB chain, and not a useful word on why you need to adjust
> this crap to begin with. What you want that poll duration to be related
> to is the cost of a VMEXIT/VMENTER cycle, not however long we happened
> to be idle.
>
> So no.

Peter,

I think you are right..

IIUC, the time we happened to be idle may contain a chain of
VMEXIT/VMENTER cycles,
which would be mainly (except the last VMEXIT/VMENTER cycles) for just
idle loops. right?

as you mentioned, poll duration to be related to is the cost of __a__
VMEXIT/VMENTER cycle.
howerver it is very difficult to measure a VMEXIT/VMENTER cycle
accurately from
kvm guest, we could find out an approximate one -- dropping the idle
loops from the
time we happened to be idle.. make sense?

Quan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-29 12:32    [W:0.071 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site