lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 3/3] x86: kvm guest side support for KVM_HC_RT_PRIO hypercall\
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 02:44, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> Again: if you have many interruptions, it's not a flaw in KVM or QEMU's
> >> design, it's just that someone is doing something stupid. It could be
> >> the guest (e.g. unnecessary devices or daemons as in the example above),
> >> QEMU (e.g. the RTC emulation used to trigger QEMU timers twice a second
> >> just to increment the clock), or the management (e.g. polling "is the VM
> >> running" 50 times per second). But it can and must be fixed.
> >
> > No, i mean you can run anything in VCPU-0 (it is valid to do that).
> > And that "anything" can generate 1 interrupt per second, 1000 or 10.000
> > interrupts per second. Which are all valid things to be done.
> >
> > "I can't run a kernel compilation on VCPU-0 because that will impact
> > latency on the realtime VCPU-1" is not acceptable.
>
> That shouldn't happen. Sources of frequent interruptions have all been
> fixed or moved outside the main thread.
>
> If there are more left, report the bug and we'll see how to fix it in
> userspace.
>
> Paolo

What should not happen? The generation of 10.000 interrupts per second
(say disk IO completion) on a given workload ?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-29 01:10    [W:0.081 / U:39.600 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site