lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: OOPS: linux-4.9.33/fs/pnode.c:propagate_one()
Philipp Hahn <hahn@univention.de> writes:

> Hello Eric,
>
> we have observed the following OOPS with linux-4.9.33 on several
> occasions when starting a Docker container:
>
>> [ 531.801537] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [ 531.801565] Modules linked in: xt_nat veth ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 xfrm_user xfrm_algo xt_addrtype br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_mangle ip6table_filter ip6_tables xt_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc joydev pcspkr serio_raw virtio_balloon i2c_piix4 evdev quota_v2 quota_tree parport_pc ppdev lp parport autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 fscrypto mbcache dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod hid_generic usbhid hid ata_generic cirrus virtio_net virtio_blk ttm ata_piix libata uhci_hcd ehci_hcd psmouseSep 28 13:30:33 master70 kernel: [ 531.802171] drm_kms_helper scsi_mod floppy usbcore virtio_pci button drm virtio_ring virtio usb_common
>> [ 531.802247] CPU: 0 PID: 1668 Comm: dockerd Not tainted 4.9.0-ucs104-amd64 #1 Debian 4.9.30-2A~4.2.0.201706171152
>> [ 531.802310] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
>> [ 531.802347] task: ffff918af7ccaf40 task.stack: ffffb47a40b54000
>> [ 531.802385] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff91234020>] [<ffffffff91234020>] propagate_one+0x160/0x1e0
>> [ 531.802444] RSP: 0018:ffffb47a40b57e08 EFLAGS: 00010282
>> [ 531.802479] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff918adf43cd80 RCX: 0000000000000000
>> [ 531.802524] RDX: ffff918ad69209c0 RSI: ffff918adf43cd80 RDI: ffff918ad69209c0
>> [ 531.802569] RBP: ffff918afb3a2480 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff918ac0183e40
>> [ 531.802614] R10: 00000000000011b8 R11: 00000000000176b9 R12: ffffb47a40b57e58
>> [ 531.802670] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff918adf43cd80 R15: ffff918afbe83600
>> [ 531.802716] FS: 00007f6157fff700(0000) GS:ffff918affc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 531.802767] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [ 531.802804] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000039e60000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>> [ 531.802852] Stack:
>> [ 531.802868] ffff918adf43cd80 ffff918afb3a2480 ffffffff912344af ffff918ac0183e40
>> [ 531.802923] ffff918afbe83600 ffff918afb3a2480 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> [ 531.802978] ffffffff91226971 ffff918afe084900 ffff918ac01c4c40 3aa437d5d9ae5224
>> [ 531.803037] Call Trace:
>> [ 531.803062] [<ffffffff912344af>] ? propagate_mnt+0x11f/0x150
>> [ 531.803104] [<ffffffff91226971>] ? attach_recursive_mnt+0x1d1/0x2f0
>> [ 531.803146] [<ffffffff912279cd>] ? do_mount+0xafd/0xc70
>> [ 531.803182] [<ffffffff91227e24>] ? SyS_mount+0x84/0xc0
>> [ 531.803229] [<ffffffff91611abb>] ? system_call_fast_compare_end+0xc/0x9b
>> [ 531.803273] Code: 48 89 de eb 09 f6 42 33 04 75 7d 48 89 d6 48 8b 96 d8 00 00 00 48 39 fa 75 eb 48 8b 0d 52 d6 cc 00 4c 8b 0d 53 d6 cc 00 49 39 c9 <48> 8b 51 10 74 5c 48 3b ba d8 00 00 00 75 3f 45 84 c0 75 55 8b
>> [ 531.805256] RIP [<ffffffff91234020>] propagate_one+0x160/0x1e0
>> [ 531.807057] RSP <ffffb47a40b57e08>
>> [ 531.808839] CR2: 0000000000000010
>> [ 531.810618] ---[ end trace f817db65f78e36fc ]---
>
> The same has happened in Amazon-EC2 and on out own KVM servers.
>
> There was a similar bug report in 2016 at
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1572316>, but that
> one got fixed with "v4.6-rc7~24^2".
>
> Maybe is has already been fixed by
>> $ git l1 v4.9.33..v4.9.52 -- fs/pnode.c
>> 54fcb2303ef4 mnt: Make propagate_umount less slow for overlapping mount propagation trees
>> bb4fbf094b44 mnt: In propgate_umount handle visiting mounts in any order
>> e260db757676 mnt: In umount propagation reparent in a separate pass
>
> but I'd like to ask anyway if you have seen such a OOPs before?

I have not.

> For your convenience here's the disassembly, where I think "rcx =
> last_source->mnt_parent = NULL":

If your disassembly is lined up properly with the code my guess would
be that rcx simply holds the value of last_source. And rdx
is being set to last_source->mnt_parent.

Disassembly a recent build on my machine I have a one byte difference
from yours, but that is what I see happening. rcx == last_source.

Why and how last_source is getting set to NULL is something I need to
read the code for a while to figure out.

>> do {
>> struct mount *parent = last_source->mnt_parent;
>> if (last_source == first_source)
>> 000000000000029d <propagate_one+0x15d> cmp %rcx,%r9
>> p = n->mnt_master;
>> if (p == dest_master || IS_MNT_MARKED(p))
>> break;
>> }
>> do {
>> struct mount *parent = last_source->mnt_parent;
>> 00000000000002a0 <propagate_one+0x160> mov 0x10(%rcx),%rdx
>> if (last_source == first_source)
>> 00000000000002a4 <propagate_one+0x164> je 0000000000000302 <propagate_one+0x1c2>
>> break;
>> done = parent->mnt_master == p;
>> if (done && peers(n, parent))
>> 00000000000002a6 <propagate_one+0x166> cmp 0xd8(%rdx),%rdi
>> 00000000000002ad <propagate_one+0x16d> jne 00000000000002ee <propagate_one+0x1ae>
>> 00000000000002af <propagate_one+0x16f> test %r8b,%r8b
>> 00000000000002b2 <propagate_one+0x172> jne 0000000000000309 <propagate_one+0x1c9>
>> 00000000000002b4 <propagate_one+0x174> mov 0x110(%rsi),%eax
>
> We will try 4.9.52 next and see, if we can still reproduce it.

I suspect you will be able to as nothing as nothing substantial has
changed in that logic in a while.

I will stare at it and see if I can imagine how you are getting
last_source set to NULL.

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-28 19:01    [W:0.076 / U:1.872 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site