lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 4/5] dmaengine: Add driver for NVIDIA Tegra AHB DMA controller
From
Date
On 28.09.2017 12:29, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 02:22:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
>> +config TEGRA20_AHB_DMA
>> + tristate "NVIDIA Tegra20 AHB DMA support"
>> + depends on ARCH_TEGRA
>
> Can we add COMPILE_TEST, helps me compile drivers
>

Good point.

>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_dma.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> no vchan.h, so i presume we are not using that here, any reason why?
>

Jon Hunter asked the same question, I already reworked driver to use the
virt-dma. Turned out it is a really neat helper, -100 lines of driver code.

>> +
>> +#include "dmaengine.h"
>> +
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CMD 0x0
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CMD_ENABLE BIT(31)
>> +
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_IRQ_ENB_MASK 0x20
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_IRQ_ENB_CH(ch) BIT(ch)
>> +
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_BASE(ch) (0x1000 + (ch) * 0x20)
>> +
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_CSR 0x0
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_ADDR_WRAP BIT(18)
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_FLOW BIT(24)
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_ONCE BIT(26)
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_DIR_TO_XMB BIT(27)
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_IE_EOC BIT(30)
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_ENABLE BIT(31)
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_REQ_SEL_SHIFT 16
>> +#define TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_WCOUNT_MASK 0xFFFC
>
> GENMASK() ?
>

Okay.

>> +static void tegra_ahbdma_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_tx_desc *tx = (struct tegra_ahbdma_tx_desc *)data;
>> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc = &tx->desc;
>> +
>> + dmaengine_desc_get_callback_invoke(desc, NULL);
>> +
>> + if (!tx->cyclic && !dmaengine_desc_test_reuse(desc))
>> + kfree(tx);
>
> lot of code here can be reduced if we use vchan
>

+1

>> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tegra_ahbdma_prep_dma_cyclic(
>> + struct dma_chan *chan,
>> + dma_addr_t buf_addr,
>> + size_t buf_len,
>> + size_t period_len,
>> + enum dma_transfer_direction dir,
>> + unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_tx_desc *tx;
>> +
>> + /* unimplemented */
>> + if (buf_len != period_len || buf_len > SZ_64K)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + tx = kzalloc(sizeof(*tx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!tx)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + dma_async_tx_descriptor_init(&tx->desc, chan);
>> +
>> + tx->desc.tx_submit = tegra_ahbdma_tx_submit;
>> + tx->mem_paddr = buf_addr;
>> + tx->size = buf_len;
>> + tx->flags = flags;
>> + tx->cyclic = true;
>> + tx->dir = dir;
>> +
>> + tasklet_init(&tx->tasklet, tegra_ahbdma_tasklet, (unsigned long)tx);
>
> why not precalulcate the register settings here. While submitting you are in
> hot path keeping dmaengine idle so faster you can submit, better the perf
>

I may argue that the perf impact isn't measurable, but I agree that
precalculated register value would be a bit cleaner. Thanks for the suggestion.

>> +static void tegra_ahbdma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_chan *ahbdma_chan = to_ahbdma_chan(chan);
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_tx_desc *tx;
>> + struct list_head *entry, *tmp;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ahbdma_chan->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, &ahbdma_chan->pending_list)
>> + list_move_tail(entry, &ahbdma_chan->active_list);
>> +
>> + if (completion_done(&ahbdma_chan->idling)) {
>> + tx = list_first_entry_or_null(&ahbdma_chan->active_list,
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_tx_desc,
>> + node);
>> + if (tx) {
>> + tegra_ahbdma_submit_tx(ahbdma_chan, tx);
>
> what is chan is already running?
>

It can't run here, we just checked whether it is idling. That would be a HW bug.

>> + reinit_completion(&ahbdma_chan->idling);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ahbdma_chan->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum dma_status tegra_ahbdma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> + dma_cookie_t cookie,
>> + struct dma_tx_state *state)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_chan *ahbdma_chan = to_ahbdma_chan(chan);
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_tx_desc *tx;
>> + enum dma_status cookie_status;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + size_t residual;
>> + u32 status;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ahbdma_chan->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + cookie_status = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, state);
>> + if (cookie_status != DMA_COMPLETE) {
>
> residue can be NULL so check it before proceeding ahead
>

Yeah, I noticed it too and fixed it in the upcoming V2 yesterday.

>> +static int tegra_ahbdma_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> + struct dma_slave_config *sconfig)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma_chan *ahbdma_chan = to_ahbdma_chan(chan);
>> + enum dma_transfer_direction dir = sconfig->direction;
>> + u32 burst, ahb_seq, ahb_addr;
>> +
>> + if (sconfig->src_addr_width != DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES ||
>> + sconfig->dst_addr_width != DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
>> + burst = sconfig->src_maxburst;
>> + ahb_addr = sconfig->src_addr;
>> + } else {
>> + burst = sconfig->dst_maxburst;
>> + ahb_addr = sconfig->dst_addr;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (burst) {
>> + case 1: burst = TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_AHB_BURST_1; break;
>> + case 4: burst = TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_AHB_BURST_4; break;
>> + case 8: burst = TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_AHB_BURST_8; break;
>
> pls make this statement and break on subsequent lines, readablity matters
>

Okay.

>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ahb_seq = burst << TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_AHB_BURST_SHIFT;
>> + ahb_seq |= TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_ADDR_WRAP;
>> + ahb_seq |= TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_INTR_ENB;
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(ahb_seq,
>> + ahbdma_chan->regs + TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_AHB_SEQ);
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(ahb_addr,
>> + ahbdma_chan->regs + TEGRA_AHBDMA_CHANNEL_AHB_PTR);
>
> oh no, you don't write to HW here. This can be called anytime when you have
> txn running! You should save these and use them in prep_ calls.
>

Okay.

>> +static int tegra_ahbdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_ahbdma *tdma = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + dma_async_device_unregister(&tdma->dma_dev);
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->clk);
>
> not ensuring tasklets are killed and irq is freed so no more tasklets can
> run? I think that needs to be done...
>

Already fixed in V2 by using vchan_synchronize() that kills tasklet in
tegra_ahbdma_synchronize(). DMA core invokes synchronization upon channels
resource freeing.

>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA Tegra AHB DMA Controller driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> MODULE_ALIAS?
>

Not needed, driver is "OF-only". It's default alias is "tegra20-ahb-dma".

--
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-28 14:18    [W:0.162 / U:32.372 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site