Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:28:45 -0400 | From | Josef Bacik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix reuseaddr regression |
| |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 01:50:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: josef@toxicpanda.com > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:28:54 -0400 > > > I introduced a regression when reworking the fastreuse port stuff that allows > > bind conflicts to occur once a reuseaddr socket successfully opens on an > > existing tb. The root cause is I reversed an if statement which caused us to > > set the tb as if there were no owners on the socket if there were, which > > obviously is not correct. > > > > Dave I have follow up patches that will add a selftest for this case and I ran > > the other reuseport related tests as well. These need to go in pretty quickly > > as it breaks kvm, I've marked them for stable. Sorry for the regression, > > First, please fix your "From: " field so that it actually has your full > name rather than just your email address. This matter when I apply > your patches. > > Second, remove the stable CC:. For networking changes, you simply ask > me to queue the changes up for -stable. >
Sorry Dave, I've fixed my git email settings and I droped the stable cc and sent a new round. Didn't see this until just now, my bad.
Josef
| |