lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork use after free
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:04:13PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> When reading the event from the uffd, we put it on a temporary
> fork_event list to detect if we can still access it after releasing
> and retaking the event_wqh.lock.
>
> If fork aborts and removes the event from the fork_event all is fine
> as long as we're still in the userfault read context and fork_event
> head is still alive.
>
> We've to put the event allocated in the fork kernel stack, back from
> fork_event list-head to the event_wqh head, before returning from
> userfaultfd_ctx_read, because the fork_event head lifetime is limited
> to the userfaultfd_ctx_read stack lifetime.
>
> Forgetting to move the event back to its event_wqh place then results
> in __remove_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &ewq->wq); in
> userfaultfd_event_wait_completion to remove it from a head that has
> been already freed from the reader stack.
>
> This could only happen if resolve_userfault_fork failed (for example
> if there are no file descriptors available to allocate the fork
> uffd). If it succeeded it was put back correctly.
>
> Furthermore, after find_userfault_evt receives a fork event, the
> forked userfault context in fork_nctx and
> uwq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1 can be released by the fork thread as
> soon as the event_wqh.lock is released. Taking a reference on the
> fork_nctx before dropping the lock prevents an use after free in
> resolve_userfault_fork().
>
> If the fork side aborted and it already released everything, we still
> try to succeed resolve_userfault_fork(), if possible.
>
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-20 20:31    [W:0.061 / U:1.812 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site