Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:18:29 +0200 | From | Alexandre Belloni <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] atmel_flexcom: Support backup mode |
| |
On 20/09/2017 at 10:30:31 +0200, Romain Izard wrote: > 2017-09-19 17:25 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>: > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > >> On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote: > >> > The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left > >> > alone after this. As the configuration will be lost after backup mode, > >> > restore the state of the flexcom driver on resume. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com> > >> > >> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > >> On sama5d2 Xplained board (i2c0 from flexcom 4). > >> and obviously: > >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > >> > >> Thanks Romain! > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > >> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > This is the first time I've seen this patch. Why's that? > > > > As the patchset covers many subsystems, get_maintainers.pl provided a > very long list of both developpers and mailing lists (28). I thought it > was a good idea to shorten it a little. Bad idea. Sorry. >
I think the correct way of handling that would have been to send each patch to the proper subsystem as there are no dependency here.
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
| |