lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 8/9] atmel_flexcom: Support backup mode
On 20/09/2017 at 10:30:31 +0200, Romain Izard wrote:
> 2017-09-19 17:25 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote:
> >> > The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left
> >> > alone after this. As the configuration will be lost after backup mode,
> >> > restore the state of the flexcom driver on resume.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> >> On sama5d2 Xplained board (i2c0 from flexcom 4).
> >> and obviously:
> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks Romain!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > This is the first time I've seen this patch. Why's that?
> >
>
> As the patchset covers many subsystems, get_maintainers.pl provided a
> very long list of both developpers and mailing lists (28). I thought it
> was a good idea to shorten it a little. Bad idea. Sorry.
>

I think the correct way of handling that would have been to send each
patch to the proper subsystem as there are no dependency here.

--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-20 11:19    [W:0.070 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site