[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 next 1/3] modules:capabilities: allow __request_module() to take a capability argument
Hi Kees,

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Kees Cook <> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Djalal Harouni <> wrote:
>> BTW Kees, also in next version I won't remove the
>> capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) check from [1]
>> even if there is the new request_module_cap(), I would like it to be
>> in a different patches, this way we go incremental
>> and maybe it is better to merge what we have now ? and follow up
>> later, and of course if other maintainers agree too!
> Yes, incremental. I would suggest first creating the API changes to
> move a basic require_cap test into the LSM (which would drop the
> open-coded capable() checks in the net code), and then add the
> autoload logic in the following patches. That way the "infrastructure"
> changes happen separately and do not change any behaviors, but moves
> the caps test down where its wanted in the LSM, before then augmenting
> the logic.
>> I just need a bit of free time to check again everything and will send
>> a v5 with all requested changes.
> Great, thank you!

So sorry was busy these last months, I picked it again, will send v5 after the
merge window.

Kees I am looking on a way to integrate a test for it, we should use
something like
the example here [1] or maybe something else ? and which module to use ?

I still did not sort this out, if anyone has some suggestions, thank
you in advance!



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-02 08:31    [W:0.055 / U:83.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site