[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Vibrations in input vs. LED was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] led: ledtrig-transient: add support for hrtimer

> >> Do you think such an improvement could be harmful in some way,
> >> even if it was made optional?
> >
> > Of course, we can make LED timing accurate down to microseconds. It will
> > mean increased overhead -- for "improvement" human can not perceive.
> >
> > If someone has problems with LED delays not being accurate enough... we
> > may want to fix it. But that is not the case here, is it?
> AFAIR David was mentioning that the hr_timer support is perceivable

He said that hr_timer support is perceivable _when he is driving
vibration motor_. Which he should not do in the first place.

Yes, if the difference is perceivable with LED in non-crazy
configuration (*), we can take the patch. Is it? Do we have someone
not from Google observing it?

(*) emulating PWM using blink trigger counts as "crazy" :-)

(cesky, pictures)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-17 19:50    [W:0.078 / U:14.244 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site