[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] zram: remove zlib from the list of recommended algorithms
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:38:56PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 04:12:46PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 02:00:05PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > ZSTD tends to outperform deflate/inflate, thus we remove
> > > zlib from the list of recommended algorithms and recommend
> > > zstd instead.
> >
> > I did test with my sample data and compared zstd with deflate.
> > zstd's compress ratio is lower a little bit but compression
> > speed is much faster 3 times more and decompress speed is too
> > 2 times more. With different data, it is different but overall,
> > zstd would be better for speed at the cost of a little lower compress
> > ratio(about 5%) so I believe it's worth to replace deflate.
> Both zlib and zstd have the compression level adjustable, zstd in a far
> greater range (from lzo-like at lowest levels to mid-range lzma at the
> highest). Thus, any such comparison needs to mention the used level.
> Ie, if you selected a setting where speed is same, compression ratio
> will be a lot better.

Unfortunately, it seems crypto doesn't support configurable level yet
so when I read the source properly, zstd default level is 3 while
deflate is 6.

> For compressing RAM it's reasonable to keep to fastest levels, and a
> non-adjustable level reduces complexity, but if your use case wants high but
> slow compression, now is a good time to mention this.

What I expect zstd is same comp ratio with zlib but much faster speed.
And lastly, predefined dictionary for 4K comp/decomp. :)


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-14 10:03    [W:0.038 / U:28.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site