lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v3 3/5] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: add driver
Hi,

thanks for this driver!

> +/**
> + * struct stm32f7_i2c_spec - private i2c specification timing
> + * @rate: I2C bus speed (Hz)
> + * @rate_min: 80% of I2C bus speed (Hz)
> + * @rate_max: 120% of I2C bus speed (Hz)

You would generate a clock which is higher than the requested one?
This is highly unusual. Any special reason?

> + * @fall_max: Max fall time of both SDA and SCL signals (ns)
> + * @rise_max: Max rise time of both SDA and SCL signals (ns)
> + * @hddat_min: Min data hold time (ns)
> + * @vddat_max: Max data valid time (ns)
> + * @sudat_min: Min data setup time (ns)
> + * @l_min: Min low period of the SCL clock (ns)
> + * @h_min: Min high period of the SCL clock (ns)
> + */
> +static struct stm32f7_i2c_spec i2c_specs[] = {
> + [STM32_I2C_SPEED_STANDARD] = {
> + .rate = 100000,
> + .rate_min = 8000,

This is not 80%. Typo?

> + .rate_max = 120000,
> + .fall_max = 300,
> + .rise_max = 1000,
> + .hddat_min = 0,
> + .vddat_max = 3450,
> + .sudat_min = 250,
> + .l_min = 4700,
> + .h_min = 4000,
> + },

...

> + /*
> + * Among Prescaler possibilities discovered above figures out SCL Low
> + * and High Period. Provided:
> + * - SCL Low Period has to be higher than Low Period of tehs SCL Clock

tehs?

> + * defined by I2C Specification. I2C Clock has to be lower than
> + * (SCL Low Period - Analog/Digital filters) / 4.
> + * - SCL High Period has to be lower than High Period of the SCL Clock
> + * defined by I2C Specification
> + * - I2C Clock has to be lower than SCL High Period
> + */

...

> + /* NACK received */
> + if (status & STM32F7_I2C_ISR_NACKF) {
> + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "<%s>: Receive NACK\n", __func__);
> + writel_relaxed(STM32F7_I2C_ICR_NACKCF, base + STM32F7_I2C_ICR);
> + f7_msg->result = -EBADE;

-ENXIO (see Documentation/i2c/fault-codes)

...

> + timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
> + i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
> + ret = f7_msg->result;
> +
> + if (!timeout) {
> + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "Access to slave 0x%x timed out\n",
> + i2c_dev->msg->addr);
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }

Could you rename the variable to time_left? It looks strange, basically:

if (!timeout)
return -ETIMEDOUT

...

> + adap->retries = 0;

Why no retries when you check for arbitration lost?

> + adap->algo = &stm32f7_i2c_algo;
> + adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> + adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> + init_completion(&i2c_dev->complete);
> +
> + ret = i2c_add_adapter(adap);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add adapter\n");

Please remove, the core will print info when adding fails.


Rest looks good!

Thanks,

Wolfram

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-13 23:27    [W:0.074 / U:11.172 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site