lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: devfreq: rk3399: Clear edev->dev drvdata before enabling dfi
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 07:52:37AM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Currently we are using edev->dev drvdata to get rk3399-dmc data, but
> it would be inited to edev in devfreq_event_add_edev.
>
> So we need to clear the edev->dev drvdata before enabling dfi, to
> prevent dfi from getting the wrong rk3399-dmc data when the irq
> triggered too early.

Your description doesn't match your code. You say you're clearing
evdev->dev driver data but...

> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> index 1b89ebbad02c..12f9f03f349f 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> rk3399_devfreq_dmc_profile.initial_freq = data->rate;
>
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);

...here you're only clearing the drvdata for the platform device. Is
that a mistake? (Hint: that's not what you uploaded on the Chromium OS
instance, where you presumably tested this.)

And if you're really trying to do what your commit message says:

We're having two different files fight over who owns the edev drvdata?
That seems like a big no-no.

We should work out who's the real owner of 'drvdata', and find some
other solution for the others.

Brian

> data->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev,
> &rk3399_devfreq_dmc_profile,
> "simple_ondemand",
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-02 02:47    [W:0.036 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site