lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] [media] cx231xx: only unregister successfully registered i2c adapters
Em Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:38:52 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> escreveu:

> This prevents potentially scary debug messages from the i2c core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c | 3 +++
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c
> index 46646ecd2dbc..f372ad3917a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-core.c
> @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ int cx231xx_dev_init(struct cx231xx *dev)
> dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_period = I2C_SPEED_100K; /* 100 KHz */
> dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_nostop = 0;
> dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_reserve = 0;
> + dev->i2c_bus[0].i2c_rc = -ENODEV;
>
> /* External Master 2 Bus */
> dev->i2c_bus[1].nr = 1;
> @@ -1318,6 +1319,7 @@ int cx231xx_dev_init(struct cx231xx *dev)
> dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_period = I2C_SPEED_100K; /* 100 KHz */
> dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_nostop = 0;
> dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_reserve = 0;
> + dev->i2c_bus[1].i2c_rc = -ENODEV;
>
> /* Internal Master 3 Bus */
> dev->i2c_bus[2].nr = 2;
> @@ -1325,6 +1327,7 @@ int cx231xx_dev_init(struct cx231xx *dev)
> dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_period = I2C_SPEED_100K; /* 100kHz */
> dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_nostop = 0;
> dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_reserve = 0;
> + dev->i2c_bus[2].i2c_rc = -ENODEV;
>
> /* register I2C buses */
> errCode = cx231xx_i2c_register(&dev->i2c_bus[0]);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
> index 3e49517cb5e0..8ce6b815d16d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
> @@ -553,7 +553,8 @@ int cx231xx_i2c_register(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus)
> */
> void cx231xx_i2c_unregister(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus)
> {
> - i2c_del_adapter(&bus->i2c_adap);
> + if (!bus->i2c_rc)
> + i2c_del_adapter(&bus->i2c_adap);

That doesn't sound right. what happens if i2c_rc is 1 or 2?

IMHO, the right would would be, instead:

if (bus->i2c_rc >= 0)
i2c_del_adapter(&bus->i2c_adap);

Regards

Thanks,
Mauro

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-09 16:27    [W:0.104 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site