lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation
    On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:24:39PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
    > > And there obviously _should_ not be any dependencies between those. A
    >
    > 100% right. Since there obviously should not be any, it would be better
    > to check them. So I've endlessly asked you 'do you have any reason removing
    > the opportunity for that check?'. Overhead? Logical problem? Or want to
    > believe workqueue setup code perfect forever? I mean, is it a problem if we
    > check them?

    Nothing is perfect. And cross-release less that others. Covering that
    case for the first few works really isn't worth it.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-08-31 10:08    [W:4.297 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site