Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Aug 2017 03:34:00 +1000 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the block tree |
| |
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:09:36 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > They all have singnoffs from the original committer. It's just > that we team-maintain the tree and had a rebase. > > Are we supposed to add another Signoff just for the rebase?
From a previous discussion, Linus said:
"On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the > "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.
Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thing as applying a patch."
So, yes, you are suppose to. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
| |