lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:53:39AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:57:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > However, how would it distinguish things like flushing another work
> > >
> > > I think it must be distinguished with what it actually waits for, e.i.
> > > completion
> > > variables instead of work or wq. I will make it next week and let you know.
> >
> > So no. The existing annotations are strictly better than relying on
> > cross-release.
>
> Thank you for exaplanation but, as I already said, this is why I said
> "I don't think it's the same level currently. But, I can make it with
> some modification." to TJ:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1479560.html
>
> And also I mentioned we might need the current code inevitably but, the
> existing annotations are never good and why here:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1480173.html

I can read the words, but have no idea what you're trying to say.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-30 08:24    [W:0.067 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site