Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Aug 2017 08:59:00 -0700 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] perf, tools: Add support for printing new mem_info encodings |
| |
> so if I find HITM with this flag set I should count it > as remote HITM then? something like attached.. untested
You mean for c2c? Yes looks reasonable.
-Andi
> > thanks, > jirka > > --- > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > index 06f5a3a4295c..65e22b9e59f9 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ int c2c_decode_stats(struct c2c_stats *stats, struct mem_info *mi) > u64 lvl = data_src->mem_lvl; > u64 snoop = data_src->mem_snoop; > u64 lock = data_src->mem_lock; > + bool mr = data_src->mem_remote; > int err = 0; > > #define HITM_INC(__f) \ > @@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ do { \ > } > > if ((lvl & P(LVL, REM_RAM1)) || > - (lvl & P(LVL, REM_RAM2))) { > + (lvl & P(LVL, REM_RAM2)) || mr) { > stats->rmt_dram++; > if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HIT)) > stats->ld_shared++; > @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ do { \ > } > > if ((lvl & P(LVL, REM_CCE1)) || > - (lvl & P(LVL, REM_CCE2))) { > + (lvl & P(LVL, REM_CCE2)) || mr) { > if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HIT)) > stats->rmt_hit++; > else if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HITM)) >
| |