lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: ibm: emac: Fix some error handling path in 'emac_probe()'
From
Date
Le 19/08/2017 à 15:22, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
> On Saturday, August 19, 2017 1:07:57 AM CEST Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> If 'irq_of_parse_and_map()' or 'of_address_to_resource()' fail, 'err' is
>> known to be 0 at this point.
>> So return -ENODEV instead in the first case and propagate the error
>> returned by 'of_address_to_resource()' in the 2nd case.
>>
>> While at it, turn a 'err != 0' test into an equivalent 'err' to be more
>> consistent.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.c
>> index 95135d20458f..1af56a97fb47 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.c
>> [...]
>> /* Map EMAC regs */
>> - if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &dev->rsrc_regs)) {
>> + err = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &dev->rsrc_regs);
>> + if (err) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "%pOF: Can't get registers address\n", np);
>> goto err_irq_unmap;
>> }
>> // TODO : request_mem_region
>> dev->emacp = ioremap(dev->rsrc_regs.start,
>> resource_size(&dev->rsrc_regs));
>> ...
> If you want to go for 101%: you could get rid of this block
> altogether by doing:
> dev->emacp = of_iomap(np, 0);
>
> Note1:
> This will also make the rsrc_regs variable in the emac_instance
> struct redundant. So simply remove it from the core.h.
>
> Note2: if you want to go for 110%, you could replace this with
> platform_get_resource() and devm_ioremap_resource() (if you
> are interested, take a look at devm_ioremap_resource's kdoc
> it has an example).
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
>
Hi,

Thanks for the review and comments.

I've sent a v2 to go for 101% which axes some lines of code.

I won't propose anything for your other proposal. Sounds great but
involves more changes in the error handling path and in the remove function.
I don't have the hardware, so I won't be able to test this bigger change.

Christophe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-20 06:42    [W:0.043 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site