Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [v6 07/15] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw | From | Pasha Tatashin <> | Date | Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:24:27 -0400 |
| |
>> Sure, I could do this, but as I understood from earlier Dave Miller's >> comments, we should do one logical change at a time. Hence, introduce API in >> one patch use it in another. So, this is how I tried to organize this patch >> set. Is this assumption incorrect? > > Well, it really depends. If the patch is really small then adding a new > API along with users is easier to review and backport because you have a > clear view of the usage. I believe this is the case here. But if others > feel otherwise I will not object.
I will merge them.
Thank you, Pasha
| |