Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Baoquan He <> | Subject | [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Rename process_e820_entry() into process_mem_region() | Date | Sun, 9 Jul 2017 20:37:41 +0800 |
| |
Now process_e820_entry() is not limited to e820 entry processing, rename it to process_mem_region(). And adjust the code comment accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> --- arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c index 36ff9f729c43..99c7194f7ea6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void) return 0; } -static void process_e820_entry(struct mem_vector *entry, +static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry, unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size) { @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct mem_vector *entry, /* Potentially raise address to meet alignment needs. */ region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN); - /* Did we raise the address above this e820 region? */ + /* Did we raise the address above the passed in memory entry? */ if (region.start > cur_entry.start + cur_entry.size) return; @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum, continue; region.start = entry->addr; region.size = entry->size; - process_e820_entry(®ion, minimum, image_size); + process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size); if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) { debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n"); break; -- 2.5.5
| |