lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [x86/time] 03fa63cc96: ACPI_Error:Table[DMAR]is_not_invalidated_during_early_boot_stage(#/tbxface -#)
From
Date
Hi xiaolong,

Really thanks for your testing.

At 07/07/2017 09:54 AM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 07/06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>>> commit: 03fa63cc96ab35592e0a7d522b8edbc1e6b02d22 ("x86/time: Initialize interrupt mode behind timer init")
>>
>>> +----------------+------------+------------+
>>> | | 43436935b7 | 03fa63cc96 |
>>> +----------------+------------+------------+
>>> | boot_successes | 0 | 4 |
>>> +----------------+------------+------------+
>>
>> So 03fa63cc96 makes the box boot again. I'm confused as usual by the
>> output of this tool.,
>>
>>> kern :info : [ 0.005000] tsc: Fast TSC calibration using PIT
>>> kern :info : [ 0.006000] tsc: Detected 2195.020 MHz processor
>>> kern :info : [ 0.007000] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 4390.04 BogoMIPS (lpj=2195020)
>>> kern :info : [ 0.008001] pid_max: default: 90112 minimum: 704
>>> kern :info : [ 0.009037] ACPI: Core revision 20170303
>>> kern :err : [ 0.010002] ACPI Error: Table [DMAR] is not invalidated during early boot stage (20170303/tbxface-193)
>>
>> Sure we have a error message here, but compared to what? Compared to
>> something which does not boot at all?
>
> Sorry for the confusion, here commit 43436935b7 boot failed due to OOM which
> happened at the late stage of kernel boot while the ACPI error showed at the
> early boot stage for commit 03fa63cc96 and it didn't appear in 43436935b7's
> dmesg.
>

let's make the problem clearly firstly:

1) Commit 43436935b7 ("x86/xen: Bypass intr mode setup in enlighten_pv
system") made kernel boot failed, which caused by OOM.

2) Commit 03fa63cc96 ("x86/time: Initialize interrupt mode behind timer
init") can make the kernel boot success again, but with an ACPI error
happened.

And both *1* and *2* used the same configuration showed in the
attachment.

Does anything I missed?

Thanks,

dou.

> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> tglx
>>
>
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-07 04:39    [W:0.080 / U:1.568 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site