lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] audit: Reduce overhead using a coarse clock
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Acked-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
>
> As already Arnd pointed out, your patch should be fine as that is how
> it was before my patch. Since nobody saw any problems before my patch,
> lower granularity should be fine.

Agreed. Mel's patch basically restores the previous behavior while
keeping the 64-bit timestamp size.

Considering where we are at with the merge window, I'm going to merge
this into the audit/next branch and not send this up to Linus during
the current window; while the patch is small, I like to give things
some time in linux-next before sending them up.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-06 22:26    [W:0.040 / U:5.512 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site