Messages in this thread | | | From | Miodrag Dinic <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2 0/7] MIPS: Miscellaneous fixes related to Android Mips emulator | Date | Thu, 6 Jul 2017 13:06:52 +0000 |
| |
Hi Greg,
> How well does these patches "work" with the recent goldfish > images/kernels that are out there? I know the goldfish platform has > been revamped a lot recently, and I would not like to see these changes > cause things to break there :)
Actually these changes have been in the Googles emulator kernel repo for a long time and they fix issues found during Android testing : https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/goldfish.git
So there should not be any regression with them.
> Also, any chance to get some google reviewers for these changes? I > don't think you added any to the cc: list, how come?
cc-ing Jin Quian, Bo Hu & Lingfeng Yang from Google.
Kind regards, Miodrag
________________________________________ From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 6:30 PM To: Aleksandar Markovic Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Aleksandar Markovic; Douglas Leung; Goran Ferenc; James Hogan; Jiri Slaby; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Miodrag Dinic; Paul Burton; Petar Jovanovic; Raghu Gandham Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] MIPS: Miscellaneous fixes related to Android Mips emulator
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:56:24PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > From: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@imgtec.com> > > v1->v2: > > - the patch on PREF usage in memcpy dropped as not needed > - updated recipient lists using get_maintainer.pl > - rebased to the latest kernel code > > This series contains an assortment of changes necessary for proper > operation of Android emulator for Mips. However, we think that wider > kernel community may benefit from them too.
This is nice, thanks for these.
How well does these patches "work" with the recent goldfish images/kernels that are out there? I know the goldfish platform has been revamped a lot recently, and I would not like to see these changes cause things to break there :)
Also, any chance to get some google reviewers for these changes? I don't think you added any to the cc: list, how come?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |