lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 6/8] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On 07/26/2017 06:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 26-07-17 10:22:23, Wei Wang wrote:
>> On 07/25/2017 10:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
>>>>> On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> [...
>>>>>> We don't need to do the pfn walk in the guest kernel. When the API
>>>>>> reports, for example, a 2MB free page block, the API caller offers to
>>>>>> the hypervisor the base address of the page block, and size=2MB, to
>>>>>> the hypervisor.
>>>>> So you want to skip pfn walks by regularly calling into the page allocator to
>>>>> update your bitmap. If that is the case then would an API that would allow you
>>>>> to update your bitmap via a callback be s sufficient? Something like
>>>>> void walk_free_mem(int node, int min_order,
>>>>> void (*visit)(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages))
>>>>>
>>>>> The function will call the given callback for each free memory block on the given
>>>>> node starting from the given min_order. The callback will be strictly an atomic
>>>>> and very light context. You can update your bitmap from there.
>>>> I would need to introduce more about the background here:
>>>> The hypervisor and the guest live in their own address space. The hypervisor's bitmap
>>>> isn't seen by the guest. I think we also wouldn't be able to give a callback function
>>> >from the hypervisor to the guest in this case.
>>> How did you plan to use your original API which export struct page array
>>> then?
>>
>> That's where the virtio-balloon driver comes in. It uses a shared ring
>> mechanism to
>> send the guest memory info to the hypervisor.
>>
>> We didn't expose the struct page array from the guest to the hypervisor. For
>> example, when
>> a 2MB free page block is reported from the free page list, the info put on
>> the ring is just
>> (base address of the 2MB continuous memory, size=2M).
> So what exactly prevents virtio-balloon from using the above proposed
> callback mechanism and export what is needed to the hypervisor?

I thought about it more. Probably we can use the callback function with
a little change like this:

void walk_free_mem(void *opaque1, void (*visit)(void *opaque2, unsigned
long pfn,
unsigned long nr_pages))
{
...
for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
for_each_migratetype_order(order, type) {
report_unused_page_block(zone, order, type,
&page); // from patch 6
pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
visit(opaque1, pfn, 1 << order);
}
}
}

The above function scans all the free list and directly sends each free
page block to the
hypervisor via the virtio_balloon callback below. No need to implement a
bitmap.

In virtio-balloon, we have the callback:
void *virtio_balloon_report_unused_pages(void *opaque, unsigned long pfn,
unsigned long nr_pages)
{
struct virtio_balloon *vb = (struct virtio_balloon *)opaque;
...put the free page block to the the ring of vb;
}


What do you think?


Best,
Wei


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-26 13:41    [W:0.374 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site