lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf)
    [ Adding Kees to CC for the hardened usercopy discussion. ]

    Kees, FYI: frame pointers may be disabled by default on x86 relatively
    soon (presumably weeks or months) in favor of the ORC unwinder. So the
    hardened usercopy stack walk will no longer work as advertised.

    Using the ORC unwinder for hardened usercopy would probably be pretty
    bad performance-wise. I'm not sure what else could be done. Ingo did
    have a few ideas for sanity checks:

    On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:09:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > > > Well, on x86, hardened usercopy relies on frame pointers, but not the
    > > > > unwinder. It does the frame pointer walk manually to avoid the full
    > > > > unwinder overhead. See arch_within_stack_frames().
    >
    > BTW., I think this aspect of the hardened user-copy is crazy stuff - there can be
    > many stack frames, and this adds a serious amount of overhead even with frame
    > pointers...
    >
    > I think the current behavior is fine: if frame pointers are disabled then
    > arch_within_stack_frames() returns NOT_STACK. Maybe it could do a few sanity
    > checks: we do know the kernel stack range and we could check alignment as well.

    I believe it checks the kernel stack range already in
    check_stack_object() before deciding whether to call
    arch_within_stack_frames(). It also has an overlapping stack check.

    --
    Josh

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-07-25 19:58    [W:4.495 / U:0.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site