lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add proper condition to run sched_task callbacks
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:01:56PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> The x86 pmu currently uses the sched_task callback for 2 functions:
> - PEBS drain
> - save/restore LBR data
>
> They are both triggered once the x86 pmu is registered with
> perf_sched_cb_inc call (within pmu::add callback), regardless
> if there's actually any PEBS or LBR event configured on the cpu.

I don't understand. If we do pmu::add() we _are_ on the CPU.

So you're saying intel_pmu_pebs_{add,del}() are doing it wrong? So why
not fix those?

> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index aa62437d1aa1..1f66356d8122 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3265,9 +3265,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dying(int cpu)
> static void intel_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> bool sched_in)
> {
> - if (x86_pmu.pebs_active)
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> +
> + if (intel_pmu_pebs_needs_sched_cb(cpuc))
> intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(ctx, sched_in);

So I'm confused, if we'd not need this, how come we're here in the first
place?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-18 11:15    [W:1.854 / U:1.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site