lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 3.16 001/178] xfrm: policy: init locks early
3.16.46-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

commit c282222a45cb9503cbfbebfdb60491f06ae84b49 upstream.

Dmitry reports following splat:
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 0 PID: 13059 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170207 #1
[..]
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:304 [inline]
xfrm_policy_flush+0x32/0x470 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:963
xfrm_policy_fini+0xbf/0x560 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3041
xfrm_net_init+0x79f/0x9e0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3091
ops_init+0x10a/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:115
setup_net+0x2ed/0x690 net/core/net_namespace.c:291
copy_net_ns+0x26c/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:396
create_new_namespaces+0x409/0x860 kernel/nsproxy.c:106
unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xae/0x1e0 kernel/nsproxy.c:205
SYSC_unshare kernel/fork.c:2281 [inline]

Problem is that when we get error during xfrm_net_init we will call
xfrm_policy_fini which will acquire xfrm_policy_lock before it was
initialized. Just move it around so locks get set up first.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Fixes: 283bc9f35bbbcb0e9 ("xfrm: Namespacify xfrm state/policy locks")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: xfrm_policy_lock is an rwlock]
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2878,6 +2878,11 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(stru
{
int rv;

+ /* Initialize the per-net locks here */
+ spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
+ rwlock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+ mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex);
+
rv = xfrm_statistics_init(net);
if (rv < 0)
goto out_statistics;
@@ -2894,11 +2899,6 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(stru
if (rv < 0)
goto out;

- /* Initialize the per-net locks here */
- spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
- rwlock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
- mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex);
-
return 0;

out:
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-16 16:07    [W:0.702 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site