Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Date | Fri, 14 Jul 2017 21:32:25 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 14/14] [media] fix warning on v4l2_subdev_call() result interpreted as bool |
| |
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> I don't agree with it as a static analysis dev... > > What I mean is if it's a macro that returns -ENODEV or a function that > returns -ENODEV, they should both be treated the same. The other > warnings this check prints are quite clever.
I think this is what gcc tries to do, and it should work normally, but it fails when using ccache. I know I had cases like that, not entirely sure if this is one of them. Maybe it just means I should give up on using ccache in preprocessor mode.
Arnd
| |