lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf)
Date
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> writes:
>
> The ORC data format does have a few downsides compared to DWARF. The
> ORC unwind tables take up ~1MB more memory than DWARF eh_frame tables.
>
Can we have an option to just use dwarf instead? For people
who don't want to waste a MB+ to solve a problem that doesn't
exist (as proven by many years of opensuse kernel experience)

As far as I can tell this whole thing has only downsides compared
to the dwarf unwinder that was earlier proposed. I don't see
a single advantage.

-Andi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-13 00:31    [W:0.250 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site