| From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf) | Date | Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:30:31 -0700 |
| |
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> writes: > > The ORC data format does have a few downsides compared to DWARF. The > ORC unwind tables take up ~1MB more memory than DWARF eh_frame tables. > Can we have an option to just use dwarf instead? For people who don't want to waste a MB+ to solve a problem that doesn't exist (as proven by many years of opensuse kernel experience)
As far as I can tell this whole thing has only downsides compared to the dwarf unwinder that was earlier proposed. I don't see a single advantage.
-Andi
|