lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 02/10] cpufreq: provide data for frequency-invariant load-tracking support
    On 10-07-17, 13:02, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
    > Yes, I will change this. The #define approach is not really necessary
    > here since we're not in the scheduler hot-path and inlining is not
    > really required here.

    It would be part of scheduler hot-path for the fast-switching case, isn't it ?
    (I am not arguing against using weak functions, just wanted to correct above
    statement).

    --
    viresh

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-07-11 08:01    [W:4.284 / U:0.484 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site