Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:31:06 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] cpufreq: provide data for frequency-invariant load-tracking support |
| |
On 10-07-17, 13:02, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Yes, I will change this. The #define approach is not really necessary > here since we're not in the scheduler hot-path and inlining is not > really required here.
It would be part of scheduler hot-path for the fast-switching case, isn't it ? (I am not arguing against using weak functions, just wanted to correct above statement).
-- viresh
| |