lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter
On 06-Jun 17:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 02-03-17, 15:45, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> >> index e2ed46d..739b29d 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> >> @@ -3653,6 +3653,7 @@ static inline unsigned long rlimit_max(unsigned int limit)
> >> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT (1U << 0)
> >> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL (1U << 1)
> >> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT (1U << 2)
> >> +#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE (1U << 3)
> >>
> >> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL (SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT | SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> >> index fd46593..084a98b 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> >> @@ -281,6 +281,12 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> >>
> >> raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
> >>
> >> + /* CPU is entering IDLE, reset flags without triggering an update */
> >> + if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE) {
> >> + sg_cpu->flags = 0;
> >> + goto done;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> sg_cpu->util = util;
> >> sg_cpu->max = max;
> >> sg_cpu->flags = flags;
> >> @@ -293,6 +299,7 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> >> sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +done:
> >> raw_spin_unlock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> >> index 0c00172..a844c91 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> >> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
> >> put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> >> update_idle_core(rq);
> >> schedstat_inc(rq->sched_goidle);
> >> +
> >> + /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
> >> + cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE);
> >> +
> >> return rq->idle;
> >> }
> >
> > I was discussing about almost the same problem with Vincent today and we were
> > convinced to write exactly the same patch to solve that. And then I saw this old
> > thread again :)
> >
> > Why did this thread die completely ?
>
> Because nobody followed up? :-)
>
> > Can we at least get the patches which don't have any objections merged
> > separately first ?
>
> Yes, we can in general, but someone needs to "shepherd" them and I've
> been traveling lately.
>
> So, if there's anything that appears non-controversial and looks like
> it could be applied, the best way to make that happen would be to
> resend it.

You right guys, I should had done it since some time.
Will do the best to resend it in few days.

Cheers Patrick

--
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-12 00:52    [W:0.152 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site